United States v. Terrance Jones , 370 F. App'x 792 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              MAR 09 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 09-30161
    Plaintiff - Appellee,               D.C. No. 3:08-CR-00057-TMB-1
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    TERRANCE LEE JONES,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Alaska
    Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted March 5, 2010 **
    Seattle, Washington
    Before: TASHIMA, FISHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    Defendant Terrance Jones appeals the sentence imposed by the district court.
    We affirm.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    The district court correctly held that Jones’s 1989 Colorado conviction for
    second-degree robbery is a predicate conviction for sentencing purposes under 
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (e)(1).
    Federal law forbids a person “who has been convicted in any court of, a
    crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year . . . to . . . possess
    . . . any firearm.” 
    18 U.S.C. § 922
    (g). If convicted under this statute, an offender
    who has three violent felony convictions faces an enhanced sentence of at least
    fifteen years. § 924(e)(1). A violent felony is defined in relevant part as “any
    crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.” § 924(e)(2)(B).
    A conviction is not a “crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one
    year” if “a person . . . has had civil rights restored . . . unless . . . restoration of civil
    rights expressly provides that the person may not . . . possess . . . firearms.” §
    921(a)(20).
    Colorado restores civil rights automatically when a person has “served out
    his full term of imprisonment.” Colo. Const. art. VII, § 10. Where restoration is
    automatic, “[o]ne must ‘look to the whole of state law’” of the state of conviction
    for any provisions limiting the right to possess firearms. United States v. Herron,
    
    45 F.3d 340
    , 342 (9th Cir. 1995). 
    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-12-108
     now provides that
    “[a] person commits the crime of possession of a weapon by a previous offender if
    2
    the person knowingly possesses . . . a firearm . . . subsequent to the person’s
    conviction for a felony . . . under Colorado or any other state’s law or under federal
    law.” The statute prohibits a felon from possessing a firearm after his civil rights
    have otherwise been restored.
    Section 18-12-108 was amended to its present form in 1994, after Jones’s
    guilty plea to second-degree robbery in March 1989 but before his release and the
    restoration of his civil rights in October 2001. The state law in effect “at the time
    of the restoration [of civil rights]” controls. United States v. Huss, 
    7 F.3d 1444
    ,
    1446 (9th Cir. 1993), overruled on other grounds, United States v. Sanchez-
    Rodriguez, 
    161 F.3d 556
     (9th Cir. 1998). Thus, the district court did not err in
    counting the Colorado conviction as a predicate conviction for sentencing purposes
    under 
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (e)(1).
    AFFIRMED.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-30161

Citation Numbers: 370 F. App'x 792

Judges: Tashima, Fisher, Berzon

Filed Date: 3/9/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024