United States v. Noel Gallardo-Medina , 633 F. App'x 490 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             MAR 21 2016
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 15-50057
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00566-MMM
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    NOEL GALLARDO-MEDINA, a.k.a.
    Gustavo Chavez, a.k.a. Noe Gallardo-
    Medina, a.k.a. Gordo, a.k.a. Noe,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Central District of California
    Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted March 15, 2016**
    Before:        GOODWIN, LEAVY, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
    Noel Gallardo-Medina appeals from the district court’s judgment and
    challenges the 168-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction
    for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and methamphetamine, in violation of 21
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A) and 846. We have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    ,
    and we affirm.
    Gallardo-Medina contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable in
    light of the unduly harsh nature of the methamphetamine Guidelines and the
    district court’s failure to give sufficient weight to the need to avoid unwarranted
    sentencing disparities. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing
    Gallardo-Medina’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 
    552 U.S. 38
    , 51 (2007).
    The below-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including the
    nature of the offense and the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities. See
    Gall, 
    552 U.S. at 51
    ; United States v. Gutierrez-Sanchez, 
    587 F.3d 904
    , 908 (9th
    Cir. 2009) (“The weight to be given the various factors in a particular case is for
    the discretion of the district court.”).
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                    15-50057
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-50057

Citation Numbers: 633 F. App'x 490

Judges: Goodwin, Leavy, Christen

Filed Date: 3/21/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024