Rosa Jimenez-Gudino v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 590 F. App'x 693 ( 2015 )

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 22 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROSA MARIA JIMENEZ-GUDINO, No. 11-71841
AKA Rosemary Contreras, AKA Rosa
Maria Hernandez, AKA Rosemary Agency No. A008-920-096
Hernandez, AKA Rosemary Jimenez,
AKA Rosa Maria Jiminez,
MEMORANDUM*
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
ROSA MARIA JIMENEZ-GUDINO, No. 11-72706
Petitioner, Agency No. A008-920-096
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Argued May 8, 2013
Submission Deferred November 3, 2014
Resubmitted January 22, 2014
Seattle, Washington
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Rosa Maria Jimenez-Gudino (“Jimenez”) petitions for review of two orders
of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that (1) affirmed an Immigration
Judge’s denial of her motion to terminate proceedings and entry of a final order of
removal, and (2) denied her motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8
U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.
In a previous memorandum disposition, we held Jimenez’s petition in
abeyance and transferred proceedings to the U.S. District Court for the Western
District of Washington for de novo review of Jimenez’s citizenship claim, in
accordance with 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(5)(B). See Jimenez-Gudino v. Holder, 518
Fed. App’x 593 (9th Cir. 2013).
On October 31, 2014, the district court granted summary judgment to the
government on Jimenez’s citizenship claim, in part because Jimenez failed to file
an opposition to the government’s summary judgment motion. We see no error in
the district court’s conclusion and, therefore, we deny the petition for review.
PETITION DENIED.
2