United States v. Jesus Gonzalez ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             JAN 27 2015
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 14-50167
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 8:13-cr-00037-DOC
    v.
    JESUS RODRIGUEZ GONZALEZ, a.k.a.                 MEMORANDUM*
    Jesus Gonzalez Rodriguez,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Central District of California
    David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted January 21, 2015**
    Before:        CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    Jesus Rodriguez Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s judgment and
    challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 27-month sentence for being an illegal
    alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
    § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), Rodriguez
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    Gonzalez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,
    along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided
    Rodriguez Gonzalez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
    supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
    Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal; therefore,
    we affirm Rodriguez Gonzalez’s conviction and sentence.
    In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 
    222 F.3d 1057
    , 1062
    (9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it
    delete from the judgment the reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). See United States
    v. Herrera-Blanco, 
    232 F.3d 715
    , 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte to
    delete the reference to section 1326(b)(2)).
    Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
    AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.
    2                                     14-50167
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-50167

Judges: Canby, Gould, Smith

Filed Date: 1/27/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024