Santa Maria v. Holder ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                                               FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                               MAY 19 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                          U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    NAPOLEON BALDEMOR SANTA                          No. 05-76699
    MARIA,
    Agency No. A044-949-027
    Petitioner,
    v.                                             MEMORANDUM*
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Argued and Submitted April 8, 2010
    Pasadena, California
    Before: FRIEDMAN,** D.W. NELSON, REINHARDT,Circuit Judges.
    Napoleon Baldemor Santa Maria petitions for review of the Board of
    Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) decision adopting an immigration judge’s (“IJ”)
    determination that Santa Maria was not eligible to apply for a discretionary waiver
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The Honorable Daniel M. Friedman, United States Circuit Judge for
    the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.
    of removal under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1227
    (a)(1)(H)(i). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    (a).
    When the BIA cites Matter of Burbano, 
    20 I. & N. Dec. 872
    , 874 (BIA
    1994), and does not disagree with any part of the IJ’s decision, we review the IJ’s
    opinion as if it were that of the BIA. Samayoa-Martinez v. Holder, 
    558 F.3d 897
    ,
    899 (9th Cir. 2009). We review questions of law de novo, except to the extent that
    deference is owed to the BIA’s interpretation of its governing statutes and
    regulations. See Barrios v. Holder, 
    581 F.3d 849
    , 854 (9th Cir. 2009.).
    Section 1227(a)(1)(H)(i) relief is available only to an alien who “is the
    spouse, parent, son, or daughter of a citizen of the United States.” Santa Maria’s
    mother is a deceased United States citizen. We recently held that an individual
    whose mother is a United States citizen continues to be the son of a citizen of the
    United States, as that phrase is used in 
    8 U.S.C. § 1227
    (a)(1)(H)(i), after his
    mother’s death. Federiso v. Holder, No. 08-74792, (9th Cir. May 19, 2010).
    Federiso puts to rest any dispute as to whether Santa Maria is the son of a citizen
    of the United States per § 1227(a)(1)(H)(i). Santa Maria is therefore eligible to
    apply for § 1227(a)(1)(H)(i) relief, and the IJ and BIA erred by concluding
    otherwise.
    PETITION GRANTED; REMANDED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-76699

Judges: Friedman, Nelson, Reinhardt

Filed Date: 5/19/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024