Massie v. Holder , 381 F. App'x 686 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             JUN 02 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    FERDINAND MASSIE,                                No. 07-73523
    Petitioner,                       Agency No. A095-635-811
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted May 25, 2010 **
    Before:        CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
    Ferdinand Massie, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions pro se for
    review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
    immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of
    removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual
    findings. Tekle v. Mukasey, 
    533 F.3d 1044
    , 1051 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the
    petition for review.
    The record does not compel the conclusion that extraordinary circumstances
    excused Massie’s untimely filed asylum application. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(5);
    Ramadan v. Gonzales, 
    479 F.3d 646
    , 656-58 (9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam).
    In his opening brief, Massie does not challenge the agency’s adverse
    credibility determination, which is dispositive of his withholding of removal claim.
    See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 
    94 F.3d 1256
    , 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not
    specifically raised and argued in an opening brief are waived). Accordingly, his
    withholding of removal claim fails. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 
    348 F.3d 1153
    , 1156
    (9th Cir. 2003).
    Further, because Massie does not challenge the agency’s adverse credibility
    determination, and he does not point to any evidence in the record indicating it is
    more likely than not he will be tortured if he returns to Indonesia, his CAT claim
    fails. See 
    id. at 1156-57.
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    2                                    07-73523
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-73523

Citation Numbers: 381 F. App'x 686

Judges: Canby, Thomas, Fletcher

Filed Date: 6/2/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024