Hupp v. Educational Credit Management Corp. , 382 F. App'x 572 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                              JUN 07 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    In the Matter of: PAUL HUPP,                     No. 08-56403
    Debtor.                            D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00414-H-RBB
    PAUL HUPP,
    MEMORANDUM *
    Appellant,
    v.
    EDUCATIONAL CREDIT
    MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,
    Appellee,
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Intervenor - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of California
    Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted May 25, 2010 **
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Hupp’s motion
    for oral argument is denied.
    Before:      CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
    Paul Hupp appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment affirming the
    bankruptcy court’s order after a bench trial regarding discharge of Hupp’s student
    loans under 
    11 U.S.C. § 523
    (a)(8). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 158
    (d). We review de novo, Rifino v. United States (In re Rifino), 
    245 F.3d 1083
    , 1087 (9th Cir. 2001), and we affirm.
    The bankruptcy court properly determined that Hupp failed to establish that
    his current inability to repay the loans was likely to persist for a significant portion
    of the repayment period and that he had made a good faith effort to repay the loans.
    See 
    id. at 1087
     (outlining three-prong test for debtor to establish undue hardship
    under 
    11 U.S.C. § 523
    (a)(8)); see also, Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp. v. Mason (In re
    Mason), 
    464 F.3d 878
    , 885 (9th Cir. 2006) (concluding that debtor had not met his
    burden of establishing good faith in attempting to pay back his loans because he
    had not maximized his income and had not made adequate efforts to obtain
    full-time employment despite his educational background).
    Hupp’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
    All pending motions are denied.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                     08-56403
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-56403

Citation Numbers: 382 F. App'x 572

Judges: Canby, Thomas, Fletcher

Filed Date: 6/7/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024