Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co. , 353 F.3d 765 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    We affirm for reasons stated by the district court in its opinion, Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 234 F.Supp.2d 1043 (N.D.Cal.2002).*

    AFFIRMED.

    We deny Feitelberg’s Request for Judicial Notice and Merrill Lynch’s request for sanctions.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 02-17236

Citation Numbers: 353 F.3d 765, 2003 WL 23010238

Judges: Bright, Nelson, Rymer

Filed Date: 12/24/2003

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024