United States v. Ramirez-Acoltzi , 407 F. App'x 211 ( 2010 )

MEMORANDUM ^**

Moises Ramirez-Acoltzi appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and the sentence imposed upon his revocation.

Ramirez-Acoltzi contends that the supervised release revocation procedures set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) violate Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). As Ramirez-Acoltzi concedes, this contention is foreclosed by United States v. Santana, 526 F.3d 1257, 1262 (9th Cir.2008), and he raises it only to preserve the issue for further review.

AFFIRMED.

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.