United States v. Schmitt ( 2006 )

MEMORANDUM ^**

Michael Christopher Schmitt appeals from the sentence imposed upon him following the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We reject Schmitt’s contention that the supervised release statute violates the Sixth Amendment. See United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. ^006).

AFFIRMED.

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.