Singh v. Gonzales , 205 F. App'x 539 ( 2006 )

MEMORANDUM ^***

This court lacks jurisdiction to review the IJ’s pretermission of Paramjit Singh’s application for asylum and withholding of removal because he provided material support for terrorism.¹ Because substantial evidence supports the immigration judge’s determination that Singh provided material support to terrorists, the Board of Immigration Appeals properly found he is ineligible for withholding of removal.² This court lacks jurisdiction to review Singh’s claim under the Convention Against Torture because he failed to raise it before the Board of Immigration Appeals.³

The petition for review is DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part.

*** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1 . See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(2)(A)(v); 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B)(i)(I).

2 . Bellout v. Ashcroft, 363 F.3d 975, 977 (9th Cir.2004).

3 . Rashtabadi v. INS, 23 F.3d 1562, 1567 (9th Cir.1994).