United States v. Brown , 215 F. App'x 687 ( 2006 )

MEMORANDUM ^**

Brian Keith Brown, Jr. appeals from the 135-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A), and from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of firearms in furtherance of drug trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Brown, an African-American, contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court judge failed to consider the racially disparate sentencing impact between cocaine base (“crack”) and cocaine powder. We reject Brown’s contention.

A review of the record demonstrates that Brown’s sentence was reasonable. Even though the district court judge did not consider the disparate impact that crack cocaine sentences have on the African-American community, he conducted a thorough analysis of the sentencing factors listed under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), as is required, before sentencing Brown to the low end of the Guidelines range. See United States v. Plouffe, 445 F.3d 1126, 1128 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 2314, 164 L.Ed.2d 832 (2006).

AFFIRMED.

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.