Athelualdo Ortega-Lopez v. Eric H. Holder Jr. , 402 F. App'x 295 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            NOV 02 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    ATHELUALDO ORTEGA-LOPEZ,                         No. 08-73944
    Petitioner,                       Agency No. A035-554-123
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Submitted October 19, 2010 **
    Before:        O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    Athelualdo Ortega-Lopez, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions
    pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing
    his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under
    
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    . We review de novo questions of law, and review for substantial
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    evidence the factual findings underlying the agency’s decision. Melkonian v.
    Ashcroft, 
    320 F.3d 1061
    , 1065 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny the petition for review.
    The agency properly found Ortega-Lopez removable based on his
    admissions that he had been previously deported in December 1999 and that he
    sought re-entry within twenty years of his deportation. See 
    8 U.S.C. § 1182
    (a)(9)(A)(i). Ortega-Lopez has not submitted any evidence indicating that
    he applied for or received a waiver under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1182
    (a)(9)(A)(iii) prior to
    seeking reentry. See 
    8 C.F.R. § 1240.8
    (b) (an arriving alien must prove that he or
    she is clearly and beyond a doubt entitled to be admitted to the United States and is
    not inadmissible as charged).
    To the extent Ortega-Lopez seeks to collaterally attack his 1999 removal
    order, he has not demonstrated a gross miscarriage of justice in his prior
    proceedings. See Ramirez-Juarez v. INS, 
    633 F.2d 174
    , 175-76 (9th Cir. 1980)
    (per curiam).
    PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
    2                                    08-73944
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-73944

Citation Numbers: 402 F. App'x 295

Judges: O'Scannlain, Tallman, Bea

Filed Date: 11/2/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024