-
The concurrence opinion in the above-captioned matter filed on May 16, 2018, and published at
890 F.3d 828 , is amended as follows:At opinion page 838, delete the sentence: < I respectfully suggest that we should take this opportunity to fix this error in our court's precedent with a call of the case en banc.>
And replace the deleted sentence with: < Although the propriety of interlocutory appeals for denials of anti-SLAPP motions was not briefed by the parties in this case, I respectfully suggest that we take the opportunity to fix this error in the future.>
*1225The Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc remains pending. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 16-16997
Citation Numbers: 897 F.3d 1224
Judges: Pending
Filed Date: 8/1/2018
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024