Ghullam Khavari v. William Barr ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                               NOT FOR PUBLICATION                        FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        FEB 11 2020
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    GHULLAM REZA KHAVARI,                           No.    17-70275
    Petitioner,                     Agency No. A208-592-505
    v.                                             MEMORANDUM*
    WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Argued and Submitted January 24, 2020
    Pasadena, California
    Before: CLIFTON and LEE, Circuit Judges, and BLOCK, ** District Judge.
    Ghullam Reza Khavari, a native and citizen of Afghanistan, petitions for
    review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s decision affirming the denial of his
    asylum and withholding of removal applications. We have jurisdiction under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1252
    , and we deny the petition.
    1.     We review the denial of asylum for substantial evidence. See Silva-
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The Honorable Judge Frederic Block, United States District Judge for
    the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
    Pereira v. Lynch, 
    827 F.3d 1176
    , 1184 (9th Cir. 2016). We must affirm the BIA’s
    decision unless     “the evidence not only supports a contrary              conclusion,
    but compels it.” 
    Id.
     (quoting Huang v. Holder, 
    744 F.3d 1149
    , 1152 (9th Cir. 2014)).
    2.     Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s decision to affirm the
    Immigration Judge’s adverse credibility determination. Khavari was non-responsive
    and inconsistent when testifying about his wife and her family’s attempts to receive
    documentation.    Khavari also gave inconsistent testimony about the threat he
    received in Venezuela (e.g., specifically whether he was paid and whether he knew
    the name of the person who threatened him). The record does not “compel” a finding
    that Khavari is eligible for relief. See Silva-Pereira, 827 F.3d at 1184.
    3.     Khavari also challenges the alternate country designations of Iran,
    Venezuela, and Canada for his removal. But Khavari designated Canada as an
    alternate country, and he did not object before the Immigration Judge to the
    Department of Homeland Security’s designations of Iran and Venezuela. Therefore,
    Khavari waived his challenge to the alternative country designations.
    DENIED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-70275

Filed Date: 2/11/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/11/2020