United States v. Laura Cruz ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       MAR 21 2023
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       Nos. 22-50122
    22-50123
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    D.C. Nos. 3:19-cr-02284-LAB-1
    v.                                                       3:21-cr-02883-LAB-1
    LAURA MARQUEZ CRUZ, AKA Laura                   MEMORANDUM*
    Valdez,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of California
    Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted March 14, 2023**
    Before:      SILVERMAN, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
    In these consolidated appeals, Laura Marquez Cruz appeals from the district
    court’s judgments and challenges the 77-month sentence imposed following her
    guilty-plea conviction for importation of heroin, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 952
    ,
    960, and the 8-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation of probation.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    We have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , and we affirm.
    Marquez Cruz contends that the aggregate 85-month sentence is
    substantively unreasonable because her personal circumstances, health conditions,
    and nonviolent criminal history weighed in favor of a lower sentence. The district
    court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 
    552 U.S. 38
    , 51
    (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the applicable 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including
    her criminal history, need for deterrence, and breach of the court’s trust. See Gall,
    
    552 U.S. at 51
    ; United States v. Miqbel, 
    444 F.3d 1173
    , 1182 (9th Cir. 2006); see
    also United States v. Gutierrez-Sanchez, 
    587 F.3d 904
    , 908 (9th Cir. 2009) (“The
    weight to be given the various factors in a particular case is for the discretion of the
    district court.”).
    AFFIRMED.
    2                           22-50122 & 22-50123
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-50122

Filed Date: 3/21/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/21/2023