Detelin Draganov v. State of Washington , 585 F. App'x 520 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            OCT 21 2014
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    DETELIN DRAGANOV,                                No. 13-35391
    Plaintiff - Appellant,            D.C. No. 2:13-cv-00260-RSL
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    STATE OF WASHINGTON,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Western District of Washington
    Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted October 14, 2014**
    Before:        LEAVY, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    Detelin Draganov appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing
    his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations in connection with
    state court proceedings involving Draganov. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
    § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    § 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim. Barren v. Harrington, 
    152 F.3d 1193
    ,
    1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We affirm.
    The district court properly dismissed Draganov’s action because Draganov
    failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief under any viable
    legal theory. See Hebbe v. Pliler, 
    627 F.3d 338
    , 341-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although
    pro se pleadings are to be liberally construed, a plaintiff still must present factual
    allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief). Moreover, the Eleventh
    Amendment bars Draganov’s action against the State of Washington. See Brooks
    v. Sulphur Springs Valley Elec. Coop., 
    951 F.2d 1050
    , 1053 (9th Cir. 1991)
    (Eleventh Amendment immunity bars suits in federal court against a state by its
    own citizens).
    We reject Draganov’s contention, set forth in his notice of appeal, that the
    district court’s dismissal order improperly denied Draganov his right to a fair jury
    trial.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                    13-35391
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-35391

Citation Numbers: 585 F. App'x 520

Judges: Leavy, Gould, Berzon

Filed Date: 10/21/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024