Vicki Morgan v. Cascade General Inc. ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            JUL 20 2010
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    VICKI MORGAN, widow of DENNIS                    No. 08-73371
    MORGAN, deceased,
    OWCP No. 14-132896
    Petitioner,
    v.                                             MEMORANDUM *
    CASCADE GENERAL INC.; et al.,
    Respondents.
    CASCADE GENERAL INC. and                         No. 08-73463
    LIBERTY NORTHWEST INSURANCE
    CORP.,                                           BRB No. 07-0798
    Petitioners,
    v.
    VICKI MORGAN, widow of DENNIS
    MORGAN, deceased and DIRECTOR,
    OFFICE OF WORKERS
    COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,
    Respondents.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Office of Workers Comp Program
    Argued and Submitted May 7, 2010
    Portland, Oregon
    Before: KLEINFELD, BEA and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
    This case involves claims for disability and death benefits under the
    Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“Longshore Act”), 33 U.S.C.
    § 901 (2007). As the personal representative of her husband’s estate, Vicki
    Morgan brings Dennis Morgan’s claim for additional benefits resulting from an on-
    the-job knee injury. Vicki Morgan also brings her own claim for death benefits as
    Dennis Morgan’s widow, on the theory that Dennis Morgan’s knee injury and
    inability to return to his old job led to his depression and excessive drinking and
    thus resulted in his drunk driving death two years after his injury. The ALJ and
    Benefits Review Board denied both claims. We affirm.
    I
    It is undisputed that Dennis Morgan was unable to return to the position he
    had with Cascade at the time of his injury (boilermaker foreman). Thus, we
    presume that Dennis Morgan was totally and permanently disabled by his knee
    injury, unless the employer rebuts that presumption by showing that there were
    2
    “specific jobs” in the local community that he could have performed given his
    limitations, and that there was a “reasonable likelihood, given [his] age, education,
    and background, that he would be hired if he diligently sought the job.” Hairston
    v. Todd Shipyards Corp., 
    849 F.2d 1194
    , 1196 (9th Cir. 1988).
    Substantial evidence in the record supported the ALJ’s determination that
    the parking lot cashier jobs provided suitable alternate employment available to
    Dennis Morgan, and that he could have been hired if he had diligently applied.
    Evidence in the record indicated that Dennis Morgan would not have been
    psychologically incapable of performing a low-paying job, and that his alcohol use
    did not make him unemployable. See Rhine v. Stevedoring Servs. of Am., 
    596 F.3d 1161
    , 1166 (9th Cir. 2010) (holding that a claimant's employment preferences
    are irrelevant to the question whether alternative employment is available).
    II
    Under 33 U.S.C. § 913(a), “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this section, the
    right to compensation for disability or death under this chapter shall be barred
    unless a claim therefore is filed within one year after the injury or death.” Vicki
    Morgan filed her claim for death benefits more than one year after Dennis Morgan’s
    death, so her claim is barred. We reject Vicki Morgan’s argument that she is
    entitled to tolling of the filing deadline under 33 U.S.C. § 913(c) because her grief
    3
    rendered her mentally incompetent for several months after her husband’s death.
    The ALJ weighed the evidence and determined as a factual matter that the lack of
    any medical diagnosis or any treatment for mental disorder and the absence of an
    appointment of a guardian outweighed the lay testimony supporting Vicki Morgan’s
    claim that she was mentally incompetent. She provided no medical evidence of
    disability, had obtained counsel within weeks of the death, and had obtained
    appointment as administrator of his estate within a short time after Mr. Morgan’s
    death in April 2002. The Benefits Review Board reviewed the evidence and
    reasonably concluded that at no time during the year was she mentally incompetent.
    Because this factual finding was supported by substantial evidence in the record, it
    cannot be disturbed on appeal.
    AFFIRMED.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-73371, 08-73463

Judges: Kleinfeld, Bea, Ikuta

Filed Date: 7/20/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024