-
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 3 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LORENZO CABRERA, No. 15-73938 Petitioner, Agency No. A079-536-567 v. MEMORANDUM* JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of an Immigration Judge’s Decision Submitted June 26, 2017** Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. Lorenzo Cabrera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination under
8 C.F.R. § 1208.31(a) that he did not have a reasonable fear of torture and thus is not entitled to relief from his reinstated removal order. We have jurisdiction under
8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for substantial evidence the IJ’s factual findings. Andrade-Garcia v. Lynch,
828 F.3d 829, 836 (9th Cir. 2016). We deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Cabrera failed to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of torture by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of Mexico. See Zheng v. Holder,
644 F.3d 829, 835-36 (9th Cir. 2011) (fear of torture speculative); Dhital v. Mukasey,
532 F.3d 1044, 1051-52 (9th Cir. 2008) (evidence did not indicate a particularized threat of torture to petitioner). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 15-73938
Document Info
Docket Number: 15-73938
Citation Numbers: 693 F. App'x 550
Judges: Paez, Bea, Murguia
Filed Date: 7/3/2017
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/6/2024