United States v. Javier Portillo ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        SEP 18 2018
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No.    17-50142
    Plaintiff-Appellee,             D.C. No. 3:16-cr-00858-W
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    JAVIER PORTILLO,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of California
    Thomas J. Whelan, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted September 12, 2018**
    Before:      LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    Javier Portillo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his
    jury-trial conviction for importation of cocaine, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 952
    and 960. We have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    , and we affirm.
    Portillo contends that there was insufficient evidence for the jury to conclude
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    that Portillo knew about the cocaine hidden in his vehicle when he crossed the
    border. We review de novo, asking whether, viewing the evidence in the light
    most favorable to the government, “any rational trier of fact could have found the
    essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” United States v. Diaz-
    Cardenas, 
    351 F.3d 404
    , 407 (9th Cir. 2003). The government presented evidence
    that Portillo was the owner, driver, and sole occupant of a vehicle containing
    almost 50 pounds of cocaine in an elaborate non-factory compartment. Viewing
    this evidence in the light most favorable to the government, a rational trier of fact
    could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Portillo had knowledge of the
    cocaine hidden in his vehicle. See 
    id.
     (“A jury can infer knowledge when an
    individual is the driver and sole occupant of the vehicle. A jury can also infer
    knowledge from possession of a large quantity of drugs.” (citation omitted)).
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                     17-50142
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-50142

Filed Date: 9/18/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021