Scott Schutza v. Courtesy Chevrolet Center ( 2017 )

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 10 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SCOTT SCHUTZA, No. 15-55631 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:14-cv-02576-BAS-DHB v. COURTESY CHEVROLET CENTER, a MEMORANDUM* California Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cynthia A. Bashant, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 6, 2017** Pasadena, California Before: GRABER, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. We vacate the district court’s dismissal of this action, and we remand for reconsideration in light of Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633. VACATED and REMANDED. Costs on appeal awarded to Plaintiff. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). FILED Schutza v. Courtesy Chevrolet Ctr., No. 15-55631 JUL 10 2017 BYBEE, Circuit Judge, acquiescing dubitante: MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS I acquiesce dubitante for the reasons articulated in my separate opinion in Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633.