Estate of Fernando Sauceda v. Jeffrey Pollard ( 2017 )

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JUL 11 2017
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ESTATE OF FERNANDO SAUCEDA; et No. 15-17518
al.,
D.C. No.
Plaintiffs-Appellees, 2:11-cv-02116-GMN-NJK
v.
ORDER*
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS and
NORTH LAS VEGAS POLICE
DEPARTMENT,
Defendants,
and
JEFFREY POLLARD,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 9, 2017**
San Francisco, California
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The district court’s summary judgment orders are VACATED and the case
is REMANDED to the district court so that the court can consider the summary
judgment issues in light of County of Los Angeles v. Mendez, 137 S.Ct. 1539(2017).
Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.
VACATED and REMANDED.
2