Cortes v. Commissioner , 691 F. App'x 899 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       JUL 7 2017
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    HAROLD CORTES; JULIE CORTES,                     Nos. 15-71128
    15-71129
    Petitioners-Appellants,
    Tax Ct. Nos. 11252-12
    v.                                                          26444-11
    COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
    REVENUE,                                         MEMORANDUM*
    Respondent-Appellee.
    Appeals from Decisions of the
    United States Tax Court
    Submitted June 26, 2017**
    Before:       PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
    In these consolidated appeals, Harold and Julie Cortes appeal pro se from the
    Tax Court’s decisions, following a trial, sustaining the Commissioner’s
    determination of deficiencies and penalties for tax years 2007 through 2009. We
    have jurisdiction under 
    26 U.S.C. § 7482
    (a). We review de novo the Tax Court’s
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    legal conclusions and for clear error its factual findings. Gardner v. Comm’r, 
    845 F.3d 971
    , 975 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm.
    The Tax Court properly sustained the Commissioner’s determination of
    deficiencies on the basis that the Corteses had complete dominion and control over
    the payments deposited into the Living Water Ministries accounts. See 
    id.
     at 976-
    78 (affirming Tax Court’s conclusion that deposits were taxable income because,
    despite vow of poverty, petitioners retained complete control over them).
    The Tax Court properly found that the Corteses were liable for accuracy-
    related penalties for underpayments during tax years 2007 through 2009. See 
    26 U.S.C. § 6662
    (a), (b) (accuracy-related penalties); Hansen v. Comm’r, 
    471 F.3d 1021
    , 1028-29 (9th Cir. 2006) (explaining that accuracy-related penalty on
    underpayment of tax may be assessed due to taxpayer’s negligence).
    The Commissioner’s motion to strike the Corteses’ Fed. R. App. P. 28(j)
    response letter is denied.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                   15-71128
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-71128, 15-71129

Citation Numbers: 691 F. App'x 899

Judges: Paez, Bea, Murguia

Filed Date: 7/7/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024