United States v. Joshua Johnson ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        MAR 24 2022
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No. 21-30076
    Plaintiff-Appellee,             D.C. No. 3:11-cr-00023-RRB-4
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    JOSHUA CLAY JOHNSON,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Alaska
    Ralph R. Beistline, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted March 16, 2022**
    Before:      SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
    Joshua Clay Johnson appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying
    his motion for compassionate release under 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c)(1)(A)(i). We
    have jurisdiction under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
    . Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see
    United States v. Keller, 
    2 F.4th 1278
    , 1281 (9th Cir. 2021), we affirm.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    Johnson contends that the district court did not give sufficient consideration
    to his arguments for release and the totality of the circumstances, and clearly erred
    in concluding that he was receiving adequate medical care in prison, that he was
    equally vulnerable to COVID-19 outside of custody, and that his release would
    pose a danger to the public. But, the court acknowledged Johnson’s arguments and
    its factual findings had support in the record. The court did not abuse its discretion
    in concluding that (1) Johnson had failed to show extraordinary and compelling
    circumstances warranting compassionate release, and (2) the 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (a)
    factors did not support release in light of Johnson’s significant criminal history and
    the many disciplinary infractions he has incurred while incarcerated. See United
    States v. Robertson, 
    895 F.3d 1206
    , 1213 (9th Cir. 2018) (district court abuses its
    discretion only if its decision is illogical, implausible, or not supported by the
    record).
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                     21-30076
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-30076

Filed Date: 3/24/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/24/2022