United States v. Marshall Lapier , 535 F. App'x 622 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                             AUG 01 2013
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        No. 12-30401
    Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. 4:12-cr-00002-SEH
    v.
    MEMORANDUM *
    MARSHALL D. LAPIER,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Montana
    Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted July 24, 2013 **
    Before:        ALARCÓN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    Marshall D. Lapier appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
    the denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal under Federal Rule of Criminal
    Procedure 29. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    district court’s denial of a motion for acquittal, see United States v. Gonzalez-
    Torres, 
    309 F.3d 594
    , 598 (9th Cir. 2002), and we affirm.
    Lapier contends that his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violates his
    right to due process because section 922 does not require that he be provided
    notice that he was prohibited from possessing a firearm. As Lapier acknowledges,
    this court has previously rejected such arguments. See, e.g., United States v.
    Hancock, 
    231 F.3d 557
    , 563-65 (9th Cir. 2000) (rejecting notice-based due process
    challenge to statute prohibiting domestic violence misdemeanants from possessing
    firearms); United States v. Allen, 
    699 F.2d 453
    , 458 (9th Cir. 1982) (rejecting same
    challenge to felon-in-possession statute). Lapier’s contention that recent Supreme
    Court decisions undermine this precedent is unpersuasive. See Dist. of Columbia
    v. Heller, 
    554 U.S. 570
    , 626 (2008) (“[N]othing in our opinion should be taken to
    cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by
    felons . . . .”).
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                     12-30401
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-30401

Citation Numbers: 535 F. App'x 622

Judges: Alarcón, Clifton, Callahan

Filed Date: 8/1/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024