Baghdasarian v. SRT Partners, LLC ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            JAN 02 2014
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    In re: ASATOUR BAGHDASARIAN,                     No. 11-60053
    Debtor,                          BAP No. 10-1277
    ASATOUR BAGHDASARIAN,                            MEMORANDUM*
    Appellant,
    v.
    SRT PARTNERS, LLC,
    Appellee.
    Appeal from the Ninth Circuit
    Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
    Dunn, Markell, and Kirscher, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
    Submitted December 17, 2013**
    Before:        GOODWIN, WALLACE, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    Asatour Baghdasarian appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s
    (“BAP”) judgment dismissing as moot Baghdasarian’s appeal from the bankruptcy
    court’s grant of relief from stay, allowing SRT Partners to proceed with an
    unlawful detainer action after purchasing Baghdasarian’s property in a foreclosure
    sale. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo a
    determination that an appeal from a bankruptcy court decision is moot. Nat’l Mass
    Media Telecomm. Sys., Inc. v. Stanley (In re Nat’l Mass Media Telecomm. Sys.,
    Inc.), 
    152 F.3d 1178
    , 1180 (9th Cir. 1998). We affirm.
    The BAP properly dismissed the appeal as moot because the bankruptcy
    court had dismissed Baghdasarian’s case and the property at issue had been sold to
    a non-party. See Doe v. Madison Sch. Dist. No. 321, 
    177 F.3d 789
    , 797-98 (9th
    Cir. 1999) (“If an action or a claim loses its character as a live controversy, then
    the action or claim becomes ‘moot,’ and we lack jurisdiction to resolve the
    underlying dispute.”); In re Nat’l Mass Media Telecomm. Sys., 
    Inc., 152 F.3d at 1180
    (sale of debtor’s property to a non-party renders claims moot if debtor seeks
    only a return of his property).
    SRT Partners’s amended request to supplement the record on appeal, filed
    on December 6, 2012, is denied.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                     11-60053
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-60053

Judges: Goodwin, Wallace, Graber

Filed Date: 1/2/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024