Roxsanna Ryan v. Christy Brandon , 689 F. App'x 879 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                                                            FILED
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION
    APR 25 2017
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                      MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    In re: WARREN CHARLES BODEKER,                   No.   15-35212
    ______________________________
    D.C. No. 9:14-cv-00195-BMM
    ROXSANNA RYAN, the personal
    representative of the Estate of Warren
    Charles Bodeker,                                 MEMORANDUM*
    Debtor-Appellant,
    v.
    CHRISTY L. BRANDON,
    Trustee-Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the District of Montana
    Brian M. Morris, District Judge, Presiding
    Argued and Submitted April 5, 2017
    Seattle, Washington
    Before: KOZINSKI and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and TUNHEIM, Chief
    District Judge.**
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    **
    The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief United States District Judge
    for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.
    Appellant Roxsanna Ryan appeals the district court’s reversal of the
    bankruptcy court order granting Debtor Warren Charles Bodeker’s motion to
    rescind his waiver of a homestead exemption which Bodeker agreed to as part of a
    stipulation. We affirm.
    First, Law v. Siegel is not a subsequent change in the law applicable to this
    case because no court equitably surcharged Bodeker’s homestead. See 
    134 S. Ct. 1188
    , 1194S97 (2014). Even if Siegel applied, a subsequent change in law
    generally does not provide a basis for a party to rescind a stipulation. In re
    Marriage of Grace, 
    643 P.2d 1188
    , 1191S92 (Mont. 1982); see also Jeff D. v.
    Andrus, 
    899 F.2d 753
    , 759 (9th Cir. 1989) (holding that “enforcement of
    settlement agreements [is] governed by principles of local law”).
    Second, 11 U.S.C. § 522(e) only applies to the waiver of an exemption in
    favor of a creditor with an “unsecured claim.” Trustee-Appellee Christy L.
    Brandon is neither an unsecured creditor nor holds an unsecured claim. Any
    incidental benefit to Bodeker’s creditors as a result of the stipulation does not
    render § 522(e) applicable to this case.
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-35212

Citation Numbers: 689 F. App'x 879

Judges: Kozinski, Fletcher, Tunheim

Filed Date: 4/25/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024