Dane Russell v. UL LLC ( 2022 )

Case 2:21-cv-09736-FMO-PD Document 38 Filed 12/05/22 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:388 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DANE RUSSELL, ) NO. CV 21-9736 FMO (PDx) ) 11 Plaintiff, ) ) 12 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 13 UL LLC, ) ) 14 ) ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 17 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 37, 18 Joint Response to Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions or Dismissal at ¶ 3), IT IS ORDERED that 19 the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, 20 upon good cause shown by no later than January 5, 2023, to re-open the action if settlement is 21 not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not 22 prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the 23 action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of 24 the action with prejudice. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 25 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). 26 Dated this 5th day of December, 2022. 27 /s/ 28 Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge