James Camper v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc ( 2023 )

1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 JAMES CAMPER, an individual, CASE NO.: 2:23-cv-08199 FMO(AGRx) 13 Plaintiff, 14 [Assigned to Hon. Fernando M. Olguin, U.S. District Judge, Courtroom 6D] 15 vs. ORDER APPROVING JOINT 16 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 17 USA, INC, a Delaware Corporation, 18 Defendants. 19 Complaint Filed: August 28, 2023 20 21 22 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1|| TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, having reviewed the joint stipulation requesting voluntary dismissa of this action with prejudice, as executed by the above-captioned parties’ counsel o 5|| record, and good cause appearing thereon, hereby orders as follows: 6 7 1. Plaintiff James Camper’s (“Plaintiff’) action before this Court, which ha: 8 been designated as Case Number 2:23-cv-08199 FMO(AGRx), supra, 1: 9 dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rule: 10 of Civil Procedure, as to all of Plaintiff's claims for relief against Defendan 11 Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.; 12 B 2. Each party shall bear his/its own attorneys’ fees and costs regarding thi: dismissal; 0 Qs gz 15 6 3. The Court will not retain jurisdiction over this action for the purpose of > S enforcing the terms of settlement agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 17 Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82, 114 S.Ct. 1673, 1677 (1994) 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: December 8, 2023 23 24 By: /s/ 25 Hon. Fernando M. iguin U.S. District Court Judge State of California 27 28 _2- (ADNHLTD ADDDOAV IAL: THIN T CTIDTIIT ATION ROR VOT IINTARY NICAAICCAT