Double Coin Tyre Group, Ltd. v. Maxon International Co., Limited ( 2024 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL Case No. SACV 24-00182-FWS (DFMx) Date February 15, 2024 Title Double Coin Tyre Group, Ltd. v. China Manufacturers Alliance LLC et al. Present: The Honorable FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Melissa H. Kunig Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (INCHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION On January 30, 2024, the Clerk of Court filed a Notice to Counsel Re: Copyright, Patent, and Reporting Requirements, directing Plaintiff to file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 with the Clerk within 10 days. (Dkt. 5.) The record reflects counsel has not filed the required at this time. (See generally Dkt.) Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in on or before March 14, 2024, at 12:00 p.m., why this case should not be dismissed for failure prosecute. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing the forms required by the Central District of California’s Local Rule 3-1. Failure to comply with the court’s order may result in dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 629 (1962) (“The authority of a federal trial court to dismiss a plaintiffs action with prejudice because of his failure to prosecute cannot seriously be doubted.”); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 693, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[C]ourts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances.”); Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 496 (9th Cir. 1984) (“It is within the inherent power of the court to sua sponte a case for lack of prosecution.”). Initial of DeputyClerk mku