Alba Anette Dukes v. Warden ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALBA DUKES, Case No. 5:23-cv-01789-JWH (SK) 12 Petitioner ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT 13 v. AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT MOTION TO DISMISS 14 ELISEO RICOLCOL, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the filed Report and Recommendation to dismiss the petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and any relevant records if needed. Because the time for objections has passed with none 4|| filed, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in the 5|| Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); 6|| United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). 7 Therefore, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 8 1. The petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED for all the 9|| reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. 10 2. Judgment shall issue accordingly, DISMISSING this action 11|| without prejudice. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated: March 4, 2024 UL pe 15 GNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28