Mario Anguiano Betancourt v. Glen E. Pratt ( 2024 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARIO ANGUIANO BETANCOURT, Case No.2 :22-cv-02811-SB (SK) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GLEN E. PRATT, DISMISS HABEAS Respondent. PETITION Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed thefi led Report and Recommendation to Dismiss HabeasP etition and any relevant records if needed. Because the time for objections has passed with none filed, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation. , 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); , 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). THEREFORE, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation and orders that the petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction . Judgment will be entered accordingly dismissing this action without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 19, 2024 STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR. United States District Judge