David Walling v. Mehdizadeh Vincent ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 JS-6 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 DAVID WALLING, an individual; ) CASE NO.: 2:20-cv-02371-FMO-JC ) 13 Plaintiff, ) [Assigned to District Judge Fernando 14 ) M. Olguin] V. ) 15 ) 16 VINCENT MEHDIZADEH aka ) ORDER ON STIPULATION VINCENT ZADEH, an individual; ) FOR DISMISSAL [46] 17 | JAIME ORTEGA, an individual; _) 19 | PINEAPPLE VENTURES, INC.,a_) California corporation; and ) | NEU-VENTURES, INC., a ) 20 || California corporation; ) ) 21 Defendants. ) 22 ) 25 24 26 27 28 asics ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL □ 1 ON STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 3 1. Allclaims brought by Plaintiff David Walling, (“Plaintiff”) against Defendants Vincent Mehdizadeh aka Vincent Zadeh, Jaime Ortega, 4 Pineapple Ventures, Inc. and Neu-Ventures, Inc. (collectively 5 Defendants”) in the above-captioned action (the “present action”) are hereby dismissed without prejudice; 7 2. Each party shall bear his or its respective costs and fees associated with the present action; and 9 3. The court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381-82, 114 S.Ct. 10 1673, 1677 (1994). 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED is 14 || Dated this 16th day of July, 2021. ist Honorable Fernando M. Olguin 15 United States District Court Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ba ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL □