Janice Grenadier v. Wells Fargo Bank Nevada, National Association ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    ____________
    No. 20-5384                                                 September Term, 2020
    1:20-cv-02570-BAH
    Filed On: April 19, 2021
    Janice Wolk Grenadier,
    Appellant
    United States of America, et al.,
    Appellees
    v.
    Wells Fargo Bank Nevada, National
    Association, et al.,
    Appellees
    ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    BEFORE:       Rogers and Wilkins, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit
    Judge
    JUDGMENT
    This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court
    for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.
    34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
    ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s minute order filed
    November 23, 2020, denying appellant’s motion for recusal, and its minute order filed
    December 9, 2020, denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration, be affirmed.
    Appellant has provided no reasonable basis for questioning the impartiality of the
    district court judge. See Liteky v. United States, 
    510 U.S. 540
    , 555 (1994) (“[J]udicial
    rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion.”); In re
    Kaminski, 
    960 F.2d 1062
    , 1065 n.3 (D.C. Cir. 1992) (per curiam) (“A judge should not
    recuse himself based upon conclusory, unsupported or tenuous allegations.”). Nor has
    appellant shown any abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of reconsideration.
    See Firestone v. Firestone, 
    76 F.3d 1205
    , 1208 (D.C. Cir. 1996).
    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    ____________
    No. 20-5384                                                September Term, 2020
    Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk
    is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
    of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.
    P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
    Per Curiam
    FOR THE COURT:
    Mark J. Langer, Clerk
    BY:     /s/
    Daniel J. Reidy
    Deputy Clerk
    Page 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-5384

Filed Date: 4/19/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/19/2021