Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Scott Harris ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    ____________
    No. 21-5102                                                September Term, 2021
    1:20-cv-03734-UNA
    Filed On: October 27, 2021
    Lakshmi Arunachalam,
    Appellant
    v.
    Scott S. Harris, Clerk in the United States
    Supreme Court, et al.,
    Appellees
    ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    BEFORE: Tatel, Rao, and Walker, Circuit Judges
    JUDGMENT
    This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court
    for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. See Fed.
    R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
    ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed April 22, 2021,
    be affirmed as to appellees Scott S. Harris, Jeffrey Atkins, Peter R. Marksteiner, Jarrett
    B. Perlow, Michael Ames (collectively, “Clerks”) and Does 1-100. The district court
    correctly concluded that appellant’s claims against the Clerks are barred by judicial
    immunity. See Sindram v. Suda, 
    986 F.2d 1459
    , 1460 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (per curiam)
    (“[C]lerks, like judges, are immune from damage suits for performance of tasks that are
    an integral part of the judicial process.”). Additionally, because appellant does not raise
    any arguments regarding the district court’s dismissal of the complaint as to Does 1-
    100, she has forfeited her ability to do so. See United States ex rel. Totten v.
    Bombardier Corp., 
    380 F.3d 488
    , 497 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (“Ordinarily, arguments that
    parties do not make on appeal are deemed to have been waived.”). Finally, appellant
    has not shown that she is entitled to relief based on her argument that the district
    court’s order is void.
    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    ____________
    No. 21-5102                                                September Term, 2021
    Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk
    is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until resolution of the remainder
    of the appeal.
    Per Curiam
    FOR THE COURT:
    Mark J. Langer, Clerk
    BY:     /s/
    Daniel J. Reidy
    Deputy Clerk
    Page 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-5102

Filed Date: 10/27/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/27/2021