-
8 F.3d 71
303 U.S.App.D.C. 418
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
William Christopher BROWN, Appellant,
v.
Janet RENO, U.S. Attorney General.No. 92-5460.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Oct. 15, 1993.
Before: BUCKLEY, GINSBURG and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
1This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is
2ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's judgment filed November 4, 1992, dismissing the complaint, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.
3The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.
Document Info
Docket Number: 92-5460
Citation Numbers: 8 F.3d 71, 303 U.S. App. D.C. 418, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34947
Filed Date: 10/15/1993
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021