Brud Rossman v. Miriam Sewell ( 2020 )

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
____________
No. 20-7064 September Term, 2020
1:20-cv-01425-UNA
Filed On: December 2, 2020
Brud Rudolph Rossman,
Appellant
v.
Miriam Sewell, Rehabilitation Services
Administration, et al.,
Appellees
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BEFORE: Millett and Pillard, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit
Judge
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.
34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s June 8, 2020 order
dismissing appellant’s complaint be affirmed. The district court correctly concluded that
appellant’s complaint was frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); Hagans v. Lavine,
415 U.S. 528, 536-37 (1974).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk
is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.
P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY: /s/
Michael C. McGrail
Deputy Clerk