Georgios Vloutis v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    ____________
    No. 23-7097                                                  September Term, 2023
    1:23-cv-01926-UNA
    Filed On: October 30, 2023
    Georgios V. Vloutis,
    Appellant
    v.
    Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft,
    Appellee
    ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    BEFORE:         Wilkins, Katsas, and Walker, Circuit Judges
    JUDGMENT
    This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court
    for the District of Columbia and on the brief and supplement filed by appellant. See
    Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing and
    the motion to appoint counsel, it is
    ORDERED that the motion to appoint counsel be denied. In civil cases,
    appellants are not entitled to appointment of counsel when they have not demonstrated
    sufficient likelihood of success on the merits. It is
    FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed
    July 6, 2023 be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s case on the
    ground that the complaint failed to state a plausible claim upon which relief may be
    granted because his complaint alleged in conclusory fashion that appellee was liable for
    terrorists mishandling his lost airplane luggage. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (e)(2)(B)(ii);
    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 
    556 U.S. 662
    , 678 (2009) (requiring a complaint to contain sufficient
    factual matter, alleged in non-conclusory terms, to state a claim to relief that is plausible
    on its face).
    Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk
    is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
    ____________
    No. 23-7097                                                September Term, 2023
    of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.
    P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
    Per Curiam
    FOR THE COURT:
    Mark J. Langer, Clerk
    BY:     /s/
    Daniel J. Reidy
    Deputy Clerk
    Page 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-7097

Filed Date: 10/30/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2023