(HC) Sutter v. Gastelo ( 2019 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDON CARL SUTTER, Case No. 1:19-cv-01091-SKO-HC 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND TO NAME A PROPER RESPONDENT 13 v. [Doc. No. 7] 14 J. GASTELO, Warden, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO SUBSTITUTE J. GASTELO AS 15 Respondent. RESPONDENT IN THIS MATTER 16 17 On August 12, 2019, Petitioner filed a federal petition for writ of habeas corpus. He named 18 the People of the State of California as Respondent in this matter. On August 22, 2019, the Court 19 advised Petitioner that he had failed to name a proper respondent. Petitioner was granted leave to 20 file a motion to amend to name a proper respondent. 21 On August 30, 2019, Petitioner filed a motion to amend the petition to name J. Gastelo as 22 Respondent in this matter. Petitioner has named the proper respondent since J. Gastelo is the 23 warden at his institution and he has “day-to-day control over” the petitioner. Brittingham v. United 24 States, 982 F.2d 378, 379 (9th Cir. 1992). 25 ORDER 26 Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion to amend and name a proper respondent is GRANTED. 27 /// 1 The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to substitute J. Gastelo, Warden, for the People of the State of 2 California as Respondent in this matter. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Sheila K. Oberto 5 Dated: September 5, 2019 /s/ . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27