(PC) Butler v. M. ( 2019 )

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 ANTHONY THOMAS BUTLER, No. 2:18-cv-2673 CKD P 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND STAYING THE CASE 15 IANNONE M., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this federal civil 19 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. The court has determined that this case will 20 benefit from a settlement conference. Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge 21 Dennis M. Cota to conduct a settlement conference at the U. S. District Court, 501 I Street, 22 Sacramento, California 95814 in Courtroom #1 on November 7, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. 23 A separate order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum will issue concurrently with 24 this order. 25 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota 27 on November 7, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. at the U. S. District Court, 501 I Street, 28 Sacramento, California 95814 in Courtroom #1. 2 2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding 3 settlement on the defendants’ behalf shall attend in person1. 4 3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages. 5 The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in 6 person may result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, the conference will not 7 proceed and will be reset to another date. 8 4. Parties are directed to submit confidential settlement statements no later than October 9 31, 2019 to dmcorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff shall mail his confidential 10 settlement statement Attn: Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota, USDC CAED, 2986 11 Bechelli Lane, Suite 300, Redding, California 96002 so it arrives no later than October 12 31, 2019. The envelope shall be marked “CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT 13 STATEMENT.” Parties are also directed to file a “Notice of Submission of 14 Confidential Settlement Statement” (See L.R. 270(d)). 15 Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served 16 on any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked “confidential” 17 with the date and time of the settlement conference indicated prominently thereon. 18 The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length, 19 typed or neatly printed, and include the following: 20 21 22 1 While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement 23 conferences… .” United States v. United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d 1051, 1053, 1057, 1059 (9th Cir. 2012)(“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in mandatory 24 settlement conference[s].”). The term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals attending the mediation conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any 25 settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d 1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993). 26 The individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 27 2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 2003 WL 23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the parties’ view of 28 the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to comply with the requirement of full authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97 (8th Cir. 2001). 1 2 a. A brief statement of the facts of the case. 3 b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, 1.e., statutory or other grounds upon 4 which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of 5 prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in 6 dispute. 7 c. A summary of the proceedings to date. 8 d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and 9 trial. 10 e. The relief sought. 11 f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a 12 history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands. 13 g. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the settlement 14 conference, including how much a party is willing to accept and/or willing to pay. 15 h. Ifthe parties intend to discuss the joint settlement of any other actions or claims 16 not in this suit, give a brief description of each action or claim as set forth above, 17 including case number(s) if applicable. 18 5. Judge Cota or another representative from the court will be contacting the parties 19 either by telephone or in person, approximately two weeks prior to the settlement 20 conference, to ascertain each party’s expectations of the settlement conference. 21 6. This case is stayed pending the scheduled settlement conference and further order of 22 the court. 23 | Dated: September 25, 2019 bh rdf ht / (o— 24 CAROLYNK.DELANEY 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28