(PS) Godfrey v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department ( 2019 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DIANE K. GODFREY, No. 2:19-cv-00861-TLN-KJN 11 Plaintiff, ORDER 12 v. (ECF Nos. 17, 18, 19.) 13 SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al. 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff Diane K. Godfrey brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 17 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of 18 California local rules. 19 On August 9, 2019 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 20 served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 21 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 25.) No objections were 22 filed. 23 Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 24 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 25 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 26 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be 27 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 28 / / / 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on August 9, 2019 (ECF No. 25), are 3 adopted in full; 4 2. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 17 & 19) are GRANTED; 5 3. The action is DISMISSED, with prejudice; and 6 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: October 1, 2019 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28