(SS) Vera v. Commissioner of Social Security ( 2019 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROGACIANO VERA, No. 2:14-cv-02616 CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Based on 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), counsel for plaintiff in the above-entitled action seeks an 19 award of attorney fees in the amount of $26,347.00 for 27.6 hours of professional time devoted to 20 the representation of plaintiff before this court. Counsel concedes that this amount should be 21 offset in the amount of $4,900.00 for fees previously awarded under EAJA. (ECF No. 25.) 22 Defendant has filed a response to this request. 23 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A) provides, in relevant part: 24 Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this subchapter who was represented before the court by an attorney, 25 the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of 26 the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment. 27 28 Rather than being paid by the government, fees under the Social Security Act are awarded out of 1 the claimant’s disability benefits. Russell v. Sullivan, 930 F.2d 1443, 1446 (9th Cir. 1991), 2 receded from on other grounds, Sorenson v. Mink, 239 F.3d 1140, 1149 (9th Cir. 2001). 3 However, the 25 percent statutory maximum fee is not an automatic entitlement; the court also 4 must ensure that the requested fee is reasonable. Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808-09 5 (2002) (“We hold that § 406(b) does not displace contingent-fee agreements within the statutory 6 ceiling; instead, § 406(b) instructs courts to review for reasonableness fees yielded by those 7 agreements.”). “Within the 25 percent boundary ... the attorney for the successful claimant must 8 show that the fee sought is reasonable for the services rendered.” Id. at 807. 9 Counsel seeks fees for 27.6 hours. The Court has considered the character of counsel’s 10 representation and the good results achieved by counsel, which included an award entitling 11 plaintiff to $208,988.00 in benefits. (ECF No. 25-2.) Counsel declares that she represented 12 plaintiff in a successful appeal to a federal court resulting in a stipulated remand order in 2015, 13 which led to a successful result in 2017. Counsel has submitted a detailed billing statement 14 documenting a total of 27.6 attorney hours in 2014 and 2015. (ECF No. 25-4.) There is no 15 indication that a reduction of the award is warranted due to any substandard performance by 16 plaintiff’s counsel, as counsel secured a successful result. There is also no evidence that 17 plaintiff’s counsel engaged in any dilatory conduct resulting in delay. 18 Based on the quality of counsel’s representation and the results achieved in this case, the 19 undersigned finds the number of hours expended to be reasonable. Accordingly, the undersigned 20 will award the amount of attorney fees requested. 21 //// 22 //// 23 //// 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiffs motion for attorney fees (ECF No. 25) is granted; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s counsel is awarded $26,347.00 in attorney fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 406, 4 to be offset in the amount of $4,900.00 previously awarded under EAJA. □□□□□□□□□□ 5 counsel shall reimburse Rogaciano Vera in the amount of $4,900.00. 6 || Dated: October 3, 2019 ft 7] | / , CAME Te CAROLYNK.DELANEY / g UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 || 2Wera2616.fee-406(a) 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28