(PC) Ento v. City of Sacramento ( 2019 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTIAN DAVID ENTO, No. 2:19-cv-1894-EFB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in a civil action. On 18 September 23, 2019, the court found that plaintiff had failed to submit the required certificate 19 portion of his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 6. Accordingly, the 20 court directed the Clerk to send plaintiff another Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and 21 ordered plaintiff to submit the completed application within thirty days. Id. The court also 22 warned plaintiff that failure to do so would result in this action being dismissed. Id. The time for 23 acting has now passed and plaintiff has not submitted the completed application for leave to 24 proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 25 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States 26 District Judge to this case. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 2 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 3 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days 4 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 5 || objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 6 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 7 || objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 8 || parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 9 | appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 10 | v. Vist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 11 | Dated: October 29, 2019. > / EDMUND F. BRENNAN 13 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28