(PC) Amoah v. Hemness ( 2019 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NANA D. AMOAH, No. 2:18-cv-03120-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 HEMNESS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Nana D. Amoah (“Plaintiff”), a former jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed 18 this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 26, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 17.) Neither 23 party has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 24 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 25 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 26 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 27 1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 28 /// 1 Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings 2 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 26, 2019 (ECF No. 17), are 5 adopted in full; 6 2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 7 Procedure 41(b); and 8 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: November 21, 2019 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28