(PS) Bowman v. Hackney ( 2019 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANGELO BOWMAN, No. 2:19-cv-00363-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 RODNEY HACKNEY et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Angelo Bowman (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. 18 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c). 19 On October 18, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff has 22 not filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 23 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 24 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 25 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 26 1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 27 Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings 28 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 18, 2019 (ECF No. 14), are 3 adopted in full; 4 2. The action is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: November 21, 2019 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28