(PS) Bridgeman v. San Joaquin Child Protective Services ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 REGINNA BRIDGEMAN, No. 2:19-cv-02108 JAM AC PS 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 SAN JOAQUIN CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the 18 undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On November 1, 19 2019, the court granted plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application but rejected the 20 complaint, granting plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff was 21 cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a recommendation that the action be dismissed. 22 Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within the time limit. On December 4, 2019, the court 23 issued an order to show cause within 14 days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to 24 prosecute. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to 25 prosecute this case. 26 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without 27 prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R. 28 Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 || assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(). Within twenty-one 3 || (21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 4 | objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate □□□□□□ □ 5 | Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 6 || objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 7 | Martinez v. Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 8 || DATED: December 19, 2019 ~ 9 Cthren— Lhien—e_ ALLISON CLAIRE 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 2:19-cv-02108

Filed Date: 12/20/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024