(PS) Iegorova v. Tsaricati ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LIUDMYLA IEGOROVA, No. 2:19-cv-0167 JAM DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 LANA TSARICATI, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Liudmyla Iegorova is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred 18 to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By 19 order signed October 3, 2019, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was granted leave 20 to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff 21 was granted twenty-eight days from the date of that order to file an amended complaint and was 22 specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner would 23 result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-eight day period has 24 expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. 25 Although it appears from the docket that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned as 26 undeliverable, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court 27 apprised of plaintiff’s current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of 28 documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 2 | prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 3 These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 4 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days 5 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 6 | with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections to Magistrate 7 | Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within 8 | the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 9 | 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 | Dated: January 3, 2020 11 12 B ‘BORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 | DLB:6 38 DB/orders/orders.pro se/iegorova0167.fta.f&rs