(PS) Scales v. California Bureau of Automotive Repair ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES SCALES, No. 2:18-cv-03062-MCE-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CALIFORNIA BUREAU OF AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR, 15 Defendant. 16 17 By order filed November 21, 2019, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and twenty-eight 18 days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The twenty-eight-day period has now 19 expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 21 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 24 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 25 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 | Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 2 || waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 3 || 1991). 4 || Dated: January 24, 2020 C > h kt Lz / a —y > CAROLYNK.DELANEY □□ 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 || 16.scales.3062.fta 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28