(PC) Tidwell v. Bosler ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN M. TIDWELL, No. 2:19-cv-1486 TLN DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 Vv. ORDER 14 KEELY BOSLER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff moves to voluntarily dismiss this case. The Court construes this motion as one 18 | brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), which is self-effectuating where, as 19 | here, the defendant has not filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. Wilson v. City of 20 | San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir.1997). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 21 | plaintiffs motion is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 22 | Dated: March 3, 2020 23 24 25 Di inbon/Routnelidw 1486 dsm ‘BORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28