Gonzalez v. JAG Trucking, Inc. ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEONEL GONZALEZ and JONATHAN Case No. 1:18-cv-01046 LJO JLT BASULTO, 12 ORDER CLOSING THE CASE AS TO Plaintiffs, CERTAIN ACTIONS AND DEFENDANTS 13 (Doc. 119) vs. 14 JAG TRUCKING, INC. et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ____________________________________ 17 AND RELATED CROSS ACTIONS 18 19 In January, the parties who have appeared in these actions, were able settle them. (Doc. 20 117) They have now filed a document seeking to have the action dismissed with prejudice and 21 with all parties bearing their own fees and costs. Id. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 22 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City 23 of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED: 24 1. To close the action Leonel Gonzalez, Jonathan Basulto v. Jag Trucking Inc and 25 Joshua Nicholson in its entirety; 26 2. To close the cross-action, Andrew Lee Lerma v. Jag Trucking Inc and Joshua 27 Nicholson in its entirety; 28 1 3. To close the cross-action, Jag Trucking, Inc. and Joshua Nicholson, as to Juan 2 Carlos A. Hernandez, Francisco Javier Jimenez Tapia dba Pitufos Transport, Andrew Lee Lerma, 3 Stefanie Suzanne Rutherford, Noelle Christine Krawiec, Andres Krawiec and Todd Richard 4 Kittinger only. The cross action remains active as to Jose Roberto Alvarado, Juana Luevano, 5 Leah Alvarado, Frank Lopez, and Isiah Gonzalez as to whom, the Clerk has entered defaults 6 (Docs. 67-68, 75-77). 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: March 9, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28